MarkDC, while you may have an argument hiding in insult-fest you call a comment, I’m simply not that interested in working that hard to find it. I don’t know if you’re the son of a lobbyist working to protect his dad’s taxpayer-paid assets, an IRS employee worried about his job, or just someone who enjoys yelling and throwing out random facts (such as the 60% vs 30% figure), but I’ll give you a tip: you don’t get people to listen to your side of an argument if you call them names and insinuate they can’t see what’s in front of them.
Let me address some of the things I was able to discern.
For one, you say I’ll pay more for a car. I for one don’t mind. For one, I don’t buy a car every year. I buy one every 6-7 years. Or maybe I lease. But I’ll have a heckuva lot more money in my pocket from my paycheck.
You say I’ll pay more for rent. I for one don’t mind. I’ll have a heckuva lot more money in my pocket from my paycheck.
Same goes for medical, dental, insurance, and everything I spend money on. I’ll have a heckuva lot more money in my pocket.
What about the interest on my money? The government takes the money right out of my paycheck before I can do anything with it. I sure would like a few extra thousand in my bank account earning interest until it’s spent. We’re talking 10’s of thousands of dollars over the years.
And how about how the government gets it’s money? If the government only gets money when the economy is moving right along, based on consumption, then the governmental policies put into effect will only HELP the economy, because it’s the only way the government gets income. As it stands now, the government gets income BECAUSE IT CAN. They take your money before you even see it. And when they need more, what do they do? They just take more. It doesn’t matter what the economy is doing - they just take it.
And what of the expense and overhead the IRS causes our government, just to police the fleecing of taxpayers? Initial estimates indicate that the fairtax method of collection and enforcement is tremendously cheaper and more efficient. Instead of a complex tax code similar to DNA sequencing, it’s just a percentage of sales. It’s been estimated that americans spend 6 billion hours and $260 billion preparing taxes. I for one am glad to think about it going away.
Also, what do you think of the claim that prices will go DOWN due to the fair tax? For one, the fair tax is only on retail purchases, not used. Therefore, manufacturers will have to compete with alternatives, requiring them to be more efficient and reduce pricing to make it attractive to consumers.
Also, what do you think about not allowing the government to change consumers habits by manipulating the tax code?
Also, what do you think about the fact that we’ll actually be able to tax illegal activity? Drug dealers, tax scammers, and illegal immigrants do NOT pay income tax. Under the Fair Tax, in order to consume, they’ll have to pay tax.
Wait, you’re not one of those people, are you? Are you against the Fair Tax because you’ve been getting away with some sort of tax evasion with the current system, and a change to that system is bad for you?
You keep saying the calculator is a “farce” and that the tax is a farce and “you think its an ACCIDENT that rent wasn’t included” and I just don’t understand what you’re saying. Rent is included. It’s an expense. An expense I can now pay with more money in my pocket. I’m either paying the tax through withholding (not earning interest on it) or I’m paying the tax through my landlord (where I can earn interest on it). Btw, my landlord is paying less tax too, so I would think rent might actually drop, because his competitors will be dropping their prices.
If you can come back here and present some arguments without being argumentary, provide some debate without debasement, and make sense without making enemies, you’re welcome to comment.