<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The blog of whall &#187; oath of presidential transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/oath-of-presidential-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whall.org/blog</link>
	<description>Come on in and stay a while... laugh a little.  Maybe even think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>NOW I understand transparency&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2010/01/07/now-i-understand-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2010/01/07/now-i-understand-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body scanners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign promises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath of presidential transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transparency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=3475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know some of you will think me too critical of the President, especially since he hasn&#8217;t even finished his first year in office.  But I will take a little time on ye Olde Blog of Whall to point out some things I think important enough to mention. First off, this isn&#8217;t just a &#8220;he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know some of you will think me too critical of the President, especially since he hasn&#8217;t even finished his first year in office.  But I will take a little time on ye Olde Blog of Whall to point out some things I think important enough to mention.</p>
<p>First off, this isn&#8217;t just a &#8220;<em>he lied! look at him lying!</em>&#8221; or typical partisan finger-pointing at politicians.  <strong>All politicians lie.</strong>  It&#8217;s inexcusable, but there hasn&#8217;t been one that I know of that can refute it.  Some lie more than others, perhaps, and others may be over-zealous in their accusations of &#8220;lie&#8221;.   For example, if they promise to work towards something, and it doesn&#8217;t happen, I don&#8217;t consider that a lie.</p>
<p>Actually, I want to point out how Obama told the truth. </p>
<p>Back in 2007, <a href="http://reason.org/news/show/1007167.html" target="_blank">Obama signed</a> the Oath of Presidential Transparency indicating that if he&#8217;s elected, he&#8217;ll issue an executive order during his first month in office instructing the entire executive branch to put into practice the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, a Google-like search tool will allow you to see how your tax dollars are being spent on federal contracts, grants and earmarks. (<a href="http://reason.org/files/829b00bc28d497b2a576bcc56f2c2001.jpg" target="_blank">here&#8217;s his signed oath</a>).  That Act was signed into law by Bush but hadn&#8217;t been followed as much as it should.</p>
<p>As such, I could find no such <a href="http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/2009-obama.html" target="_blank">Executive Order</a> signed by Obama.  I did find an <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment/" target="_blank">undated memo</a>&#8230; looks like a press release, though.  Maybe that&#8217;s good enough.  There is one about <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-1719.pdf" target="_blank">Ethics and stuff</a>, and it&#8217;s neat &#8211; it says appointees in Executive branch vow not to take gifts from Lobbyists, for example. </p>
<p>All good stuff, but where&#8217;s the transparency?</p>
<p>Early on, Obama promised open government, and talks about policy being open.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><iframe title="YouTube video player" class="youtube-player" type="text/html" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/CU0m6Rxm9vU" frameborder="0" allowFullScreen="true"> </iframe></p>
<p>This is awesome stuff, but where&#8217;s the transparency?</p>
<p>Then there was the whole promise of Health Care Reform Legislation and talks all being out in the open, with hearings broadcast on C-Span, talks available on the Internet, and definitely, whatever may come, definitely NOT behind closed doors.</p>
<p><center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/hJNRgbu%2BTwI%2Em4v" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="364" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed> </center></p>
<p>It all sounds great, but where&#8217;s the transparency?</p>
<p>Obama also promised that legislation would be put out on the Internet for at least 5 days for public review before being voted on, and then he later promised it would be out for 3 days, and there have been a few times where bills were voted on the day they were made available.  However, to be fair, I can&#8217;t fault Obama for this &#8211; he never should have made that promise, because he can&#8217;t be held accountable.  It&#8217;s not his decision to call a vote or make legislation available.</p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s all very nice, but where&#8217;s the transparency?</p>
<p>I believe I finally found it.  It&#8217;s at the airport!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.livescience.com/technology/090401-airport-scan.html" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone" title="body scanners" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/body-scanners.jpg" alt="" width="468" height="395" /></a></p>
<p>Thank you Obama for bringing transparency to us all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2010/01/07/now-i-understand-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Government</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2008/01/30/google-government/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2008/01/30/google-government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama vs hillary clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oath of presidential transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pork spending]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/2008/01/30/google-government/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read recently that the Reason Foundation, a non-profit group asked the presidential hopefuls if they would sign on to the following idea &#8211; the Oath of Presidential Transparency: If elected president, I will issue an executive order instructing the entire executive branch to make its spending data available to an online search engine. Whoa [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read recently that the <a target="_blank" href="http://reason.org">Reason Foundation</a>, a non-profit group asked the presidential hopefuls if they would sign on to the following idea &#8211; the <a target="_blank" href="http://reason.org/oath/">Oath of Presidential Transparency</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>If elected president, I will issue an executive order instructing the entire executive branch to make its spending data available to an online search engine.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoa &#8211; what a concept, eh?  Being able to pore through and see where all our taxpayer&#8217;s money is being spent?  It kind of sounds interesting &#8211; I mean, as a stockholder in a public company, I&#8217;m entitled to see reports on spending, income, etc.  Why not in the most public company of all?</p>
<p>To be fair, I can see some items needing protection in the interest of national security, but in general, I would think the more people are aware of where money is going, the more they&#8217;ll care where money is going.  If nothing else, it would reveal pork spending, &#8220;earmarks,&#8221; and maybe as a result politicians wouldn&#8217;t be so hungry to appease lobbyists if they knew their financial decisions were available for all to see.</p>
<p>What do YOU think?  Do you care where our money is spent? </p>
<p>btw, so far, the following candidates have signed the oath:</p>
<ul>
<li>Barack Obama</li>
<li>Ron Paul</li>
<li>Sam Brownback</li>
<li>Mike Gravel</li>
<li>Dennis Kucinich</li>
</ul>
<p>I already had many reasons to like Obama over Hillary, but this is yet another.  I wonder if McCain has the cajones to follow suit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2008/01/30/google-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
