<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The blog of whall &#187; vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whall.org/blog</link>
	<description>Come on in and stay a while... laugh a little.  Maybe even think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Live Writer Test</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/22/live-writer-test/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/22/live-writer-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About the blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Online Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie maker 2.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows movie maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows seven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=2569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm.  Once Upon A time, on this Windows 7 thing there existed absolutely no Windows Movie Maker.  I use WMM to make my DITLs, so it was kind of frustrating to realize that I was required to do more work just so I could do the work to get it to work. That’s like me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Once Upon A time, on this Windows 7 thing there existed absolutely no Windows Movie Maker.  I use WMM to make <a href="http://whall.org/blog/category/vlogs/" target="_blank">my DITLs</a>, so it was kind of frustrating to realize that I was required to do more work just so I could do the work to get it to work.</p>
<p>That’s like me being the dude, playing the dude, disguised as another dude.</p>
<p>Being the savvy and worldly beta user, I decided to <a href="windows seven &quot;movie maker beta&quot;" target="_blank">google about windows 7 and windows movie maker first</a> to make sure someone else hadn’t accidentally deleted all their videos and set accidental fire to accidental baby kittens from installing the beta version and trying to create new content.</p>
<p>What I quickly found out was the version of Windows Movie Maker that Microsoft makes available is A) part of Windows Live (a collection of many online tools) and B) devoid of many advanced features that I depend on.  For example, I&#8217;m not a bit funny by myself, but Windows Movie Maker has that setting where you can make it &#8220;decently funny if a bit quirky&#8221; and I have mine set to 70%.</p>
<p>However, I also found out soon enough that MS <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=D6BA5972-328E-4DF7-8F9D-068FC0F80CFC&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">packaged up the Vista version of WMM (2.6)</a> for those of us who still needed the advanced features.  This made me happier than finding out Michael Phelps is more human than I expected and the media is more inhuman than I expected.</p>
<p>While I’m playing with installing WMM 2.6, I thought I’d give <a href="http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/" target="_blank">Live Writer</a> a try – it’s a blog publishing tool that comes with the Windows Live collection and works with all sorts of blog platforms, including WordPress (which is what I use for this blog).</p>
<p>In fact, I’m actually composing this blog post with Live Writer.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone" title="editing wordpress blogs in microsoft live writer" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/live-writer-2.jpg" alt="" width="456" height="751" /></p>
<p>About the only things I care about regarding blog composition that save me time when writing a blog post is A) indenting text (which it seems Live Writer does NOT support) and B) pasting in pictures.  I pasted in the picture above, so we’ll see how it looks.</p>
<p>It kinda looks freaky with the whole picture within a picture thing.  How did it do that?  And how far does it go?  I&#8217;m scared.  I&#8217;m writing in my blog about writing in my blog, so I guess it&#8217;s like two mirrors facing each other.</p>
<p>I’ve <a href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/word-2007/" target="_blank">used Microsoft’s Word 2007 to publish blog entries before</a>, mainly because it had a geek factor to it and it also supported all my special little styling whims.  I could also compose while offline (like when taking bus to work) and publish later, and I always had a problem with that on WordPress.  This seems like a suitable replacement. Oh, and if your luggage ever gets lost or stolen, Samsonite is also a suitable replacement.</p>
<p>Time Passes&#8230;</p>
<p>So now I&#8217;ve attempted to publish this entry as a draft on my blog, but I keep getting a <strong>500 Internal Server Error</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone" title="live writer server error the server reported an error with the following url xmlrpc.php 500 internal server error" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/live-writer-1.jpg" alt="" width="363" height="238" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m too <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">tired</span> busy to troubleshoot if this is a WordPress 2.7.1 problem, a Windows Seven problem, a Live Writer bug or if it could be possibly explained by too much gluten in my diet.  (Wayne, don&#8217;t be so silly. Ack!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/22/live-writer-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/19/seven-2/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/19/seven-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64 bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple default printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roboform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[send feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharepoint datasheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snagit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snipping tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend micro officescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows seven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=2546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend, I bit the bullet and installed Windows 7 BETA on my work laptop, replacing Vista.  This is pretty big, given that at work we&#8217;re still standardized on Windows XP.  My move to Vista last year was an important leap of faith as it was, so going to Windows 7 (aka W7) marks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past weekend, I bit the bullet and installed <strong>Windows 7</strong> <strong>BETA</strong> on my work laptop, replacing Vista.  This is pretty big, given that at work we&#8217;re still standardized on Windows XP.  My <a href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/vista/" target="_blank">move to Vista last year</a> was an important leap of faith as it was, so going to Windows 7 (aka W7) marks an even more risky foray into the world of Microsoft Operating Systems.  And going with beta makes it risk combined with cavalier abandon.</p>
<p>I have survived.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s been pretty fun.</p>
<p>Here are some of the things I&#8217;ve noticed so far that are worth mentioning.  I should point out that some of these may have been there in Vista and I just never noticed them.</p>
<p>To save on front page space, the rest is in the extended entry.</p>
<p><span id="more-2546"></span></p>
<p><strong>Multiple </strong><strong>default printers</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">When I&#8217;m at home, my default printer is [X]. When I&#8217;m at work, my default printer is [Y].  This is just so common sense I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m happy about it showing up in 2009.  But it really is COOL.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It was nice for W7 to actually ask me what I wanted to do when I was adding the printer the first time.  It&#8217;s also nice that I can just bring up the start menu, type in &#8220;default printer&#8221; and it knows what I&#8217;m trying to do.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone" title="windows seven manage default printers network" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/w7-printers-1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="251" /></p>
<p><strong>The thing is super fast</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I put my laptop specs down at the bottom, and YES, I realize I have a nice laptop.  I originally had XP on it but when I switched to Vista almost a year ago, I noticed Vista to be faster.  In general.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The <a href="http://phillsimpson.com/" target="_blank">person who recommended W7 to me</a> said that W7 was even faster than Vista.  I&#8217;ve found that to be quite correct.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">However, I have to point out that I installed the 64-bit version of Windows 7, but I only had the 32-bit version of Vista before.  I can&#8217;t determine how much of my speed increase was due to each of three factors:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>1) A reinstall / purge </strong><br />
Starting over on any machine that&#8217;s been used for a while is bound to get a performance increase because of all the stuff you&#8217;ve loaded up over that time.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>2) Windows 7 over Vista </strong><br />
All I have going for this is that I&#8217;ve <em>heard </em>it&#8217;s faster.  I have no empirical data.  I don&#8217;t even have an empire.  Me so sad.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>3) 64bit vs 32bit</strong><br />
My gut feel is that this is probably the biggest reason for the performance increase, although I also have no empirical data.  According to Geekbench, <a href="http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmark.html" target="_blank">64bit Vista is about 10% faster than 32bit Vista</a>, all else being equal.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">So, maybe each of the three had their input into the net result &#8211; all I know is that it <em>feels</em> twice as fast.  Windows pop up almost like they&#8217;d been expecting my click. Maybe the government is just watching me.</p>
<p><strong>Improved boot video</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[youtube j7oDvY1-XeY]</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">You&#8217;d think posting about the animation used when a system boots is the epitome of &#8220;<em>has he run out of things to blog about</em>?&#8221;  But no.  It is pretty cool.  Kind of like some light energy bugs are converging and becoming the Vista/7 logo.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I think first impressions are important.  That&#8217;s why when I meet people I give them a lot of money.  I have so many friends!</p>
<p><strong>Snipping tool is cool</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve been a power user of <a href="http://www.techsmith.com/screen-capture.asp" target="_blank">SnagIt from TechSmith</a> for close to 7 years.  It&#8217;s one of the few tools I make sure I install as soon as I get on a machine.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">When I googled for any issues (I do this on almost all my installs of a new OS &#8211; find out if someone else has broken their machine by installing [X] software on [Y] OS) I saw a few things about the snipping tool that comes built-in to W7.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I also found out that it came with Vista.  Huh.  Go Figure.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Anyway, you can just Start Menu, type in &#8220;snip&#8221; and select the Snipping Tool and away you go &#8211; select a portion of the screen and it brings up a quick editor that you can annotate (very little), copy to clipboard, etc.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Apple&#8217;s OS X has had this for a while, and I think it&#8217;s great Microsoft has added it.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Still doesn&#8217;t hold a candle to SnagIt.  However, it&#8217;s nice to know I have it available when I&#8217;m visiting someone else&#8217;s computer.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Send Feedback&#8221; feature</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I really like how, just about everywhere you go, there&#8217;s the ability to &#8220;send feedback&#8221; to Microsoft on windows and features.  It allows you to rate your experience 1-7 stars, categorize your input, and tell what you like and don&#8217;t like.  This is surely just a &#8220;beta&#8221; feature but how cool would it be to be able to turn on &#8220;user feedback mode&#8221; on not only your operating system but also your applications?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I use it 5-10 times per day.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Now, if we could get that feature on the government&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>More sensible backups</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Chalk this up as another &#8220;<em>maybe this was there before but I didn&#8217;t notice it</em>&#8221; type of feature.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I plugged in a 500GB USB drive and in the AutoPlay window that popped up, I saw the option to &#8220;<em>use this drive as a backup</em>.&#8221;  This reminded me of the OS X Time Machine start-up ability (<em>except that Apple recommends that the drive be dedicated to Time Machine, which I don&#8217;t like</em>).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">You can specify more schedule options (<em>which is nice</em>) and the backup more or less happens in the background (<em>which is nice</em>).  But it didn&#8217;t tell me how long it would take, and it still just isn&#8217;t as good as Time Machine in the &#8220;<em>I have you covered</em>&#8221; area.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">For example, onApple&#8217;s  Time Machine, the default is to &#8220;snapshot&#8221; or make recoverable each hour from the last 24 hours, each day for the last week, etc.  It&#8217;s sensible.  I wish we had that for Windows.  It&#8217;s just smarter.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In fact, I wish it would extend not only to other media, but online backup as well.  I should be able to point to FTP or other protocol-enabled storage sources and have it just Do The Right Thing™.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Still, Windows improved in this area quite a bit.  Kudo&#8217;s, Microsoft.</p>
<h3>The Issues</h3>
<p>And here are a few issues I&#8217;ve ran into.</p>
<p><strong>SharePoint on IE8 </strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Most everything seems to work ok, but I use datasheet mode on SharePoint all the time.  Think of using Excel or Numbers (spreadsheet) but interactive, on the web, and sharable by multiple people simultaneously.  That&#8217;s a great feature of SharePoint, and it&#8217;s called datasheet view.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">One of the cool things you can do in datasheet view is highlight some cells, and drag the auto-fill part of the selected area to other empty cells.  This either copies their data or intelligently alters them.  For example, if you have a series of dates, highlight 2 or 3 of them and then drag the autofill down and it increments the dates.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">This just doesn&#8217;t work in Internet Explorer 8, and it&#8217;s killing me!</p>
<h3>Other IE8 issues</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve noticed many sites don&#8217;t work, but that&#8217;s ok.  evite.com, anything with flash, etc.  So I just use FireFox 3.x which seems to work great.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;m also impressed that Roboform works with firefox now (and IE8) so I&#8217;m able to auto-fill things with either browser.  Sweet!</p>
<h3>Applications I&#8217;ve installed so far</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here are the apps I&#8217;ve installed with little or no issue so far on my  Windows 7 64-bit laptop:</p>
<ul>
<li>Office 2007</li>
<li>Firefox 3.0</li>
<li>Adobe Reader 9.0</li>
<li>Roboform</li>
<li>CanoScan Toolbox (for my Canon LIDE 60 scanner)</li>
<li>FeedDemon / FeedStation</li>
<li>Office Live Meeting 2007</li>
<li>Office Live Meeting 2007 add-ins for Outlook</li>
<li>Picasa 3 (there are special backup/restore steps for this)</li>
<li>Putty v0.60</li>
<li>Snagit 9.1.1</li>
<li>TreeSize Free v2.2.1</li>
<li>Trillian Pro 3.1</li>
<li>TweetDeck (with Adobe AIR)</li>
<li>VMWare Infrastructure Client 2.5.0.64227</li>
<li>Weather Channel Desktop (came with something&#8230; I forget which.  Maybe Trillian?)</li>
<li>VIM 7.2 (with gvim)</li>
<li>UPDATE: Trend Micro OfficeScan v8.0 64-bit edition (MSI-based install)</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Laptop Specs:</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Dell Latitude D630<br />
Duo-core 2.00Ghz cpu<br />
3GB RAM / 250GB 7200 rpm hard drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/19/seven-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catastrophic FAIL</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2009/01/15/catastrophic-fail/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2009/01/15/catastrophic-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[0x8000ffff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catastrophic failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whall reads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=2472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: This blog post is also available via audio.  It is read by the author on Utterli. I think Microsoft&#8217;s Developers and I define &#8220;catastrophic failure&#8221; a wee bit differently. First off, in my mind, if I saw a message that said &#8220;catastrophic failure,&#8221; I&#8217;d be thinking &#8211; if it&#8217;s so catastrophic, why is there even a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Note: This blog post is also available via audio.  It is </em><a href="http://www.utterli.com/u/utt/u-ODExNTY2Mg#utt-ODExNTY2Mg" target="_blank"><span><em>read by the author on Utterli</em></span></a><em>.</em></p>
<p>I think Microsoft&#8217;s Developers and I define &#8220;catastrophic failure&#8221; a <em>wee bit</em> differently.</p>
<p>First off, in my mind, if I saw a message that said &#8220;<strong>catastrophic failure</strong>,&#8221; I&#8217;d be thinking &#8211; <em>if it&#8217;s so catastrophic, why is there even a message?  </em>Doesn&#8217;t the meaning of &#8220;catastrophic&#8221; carry a little bit of a connotation of the end of the world?  </p>
<p>I mean, shouldn&#8217;t something that&#8217;s catastrophic be, um&#8230; obvious?</p>
<p>You might be wondering where I got this message.  I received it from a pop-up message in my Vista system tray, indicating that the last scheduled backup didn&#8217;t run.</p>
<p> </p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 376px"><img title="the backup did not complete successfully.  An error occurred.  the following information might help you resolve the error.  Catastrophic failure 0x8000fff.  try again. adjust settings" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-backup-error-1.jpg" alt="Catastrophic failure as defined by Microsoft" width="366" height="263" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Catastrophic failure as defined by Microsoft</p></div>
<p>Since my mind is already in &#8220;catastrophe mode,&#8221; I&#8217;ve decided to say some of the more important things in a blood red font.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="this is a good example of horribly bad error messages in Vista" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-backup-error-2.jpg" alt="" width="366" height="83" /></p>
<p>Most people who frequent my blog know that I&#8217;m a <a href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/vista/" target="_blank">big Vista fan</a>.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean angels decended from heaven and said &#8220;blessed thou art&#8221; on this thing, making it flawless and perfect.  Oh no.  That event has been predicted and reserved by the media for 5 days from now, and you can only have one of those events every 2000 years.  It&#8217;s not likely that my laptop received that kind of sanctification.</p>
<p>The above is what I get when I click &#8220;more details.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;d be way off the mark if I suggested that &#8211; this does NOT give me useful details.  Maybe I missed the link that said &#8220;useful details.&#8221;</p>
<p>So what do I do?  I PERSEVERE.  I ignore the error message and attempt to adjust the settings.  I basically adjust NO settings, however, and go through the wizard to back up.</p>
<p>This time (ye gods) it DOES give me a decent error message.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="the disk C: has errors.  Windows has detected file system corruption on C:.  You must check the disk for errors before it can be restored.  the plot thickens, as does the pool of blood from this wicked font" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-backup-error-3.jpg" alt="" width="366" height="304" /></p>
<p>Now all I gotta do is check the disk for errors.</p>
<p>Except that, like all good operating systems, Vista doesn&#8217;t let you check the main system disk for errors while it&#8217;s actually running and stuff.  All you Unix admins know you have to be in singe-user mode to fsck the root (/) partition.  I don&#8217;t know what Macs do in that situation, but I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s similar, just with a lot of fantastic eye candy.</p>
<p>So even though you click the &#8220;check the disk for errors&#8221; link, you don&#8217;t really get to do that.  You get to choose to check the disk &#8212; say it with me together &#8212; <em>when the system next reboots</em>.</p>
<p>Fantastic.  </p>
<p>I might as well do the reboot / check / redo the backups thing while I eat my lunch.</p>
<p>Wait.  Let me resay that in a better font.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="aligncenter" title="I might as well do the reboot / check / redo the backups thing while I eat my lunch.  of kittens and babies." src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-backup-error-4.jpg" alt="" width="366" height="190" />Hey!  I swear I didn&#8217;t put that in there!  It&#8217;s the font!  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2009/01/15/catastrophic-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In which I wax narcissistic&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2009/01/09/in-which-i-wax-narcissistic/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2009/01/09/in-which-i-wax-narcissistic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer upgrade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[it director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narcissism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xp media center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=2444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our home computer, you know, the one for the family in the kitchen-nook-cranny area, has served us well for a long time.  However, for the last, oh&#8230;. six months or so, it&#8217;s been annoying to most of the family. It doesn&#8217;t annoy me directly, because I have a kick-butt laptop that is almost always awesome-like [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our home computer, you know, the one for the family in the kitchen-nook-cranny area, has served us well for a long time.  However, for the last, oh&#8230;. six months or so, it&#8217;s been annoying to most of the family.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t annoy me directly, because I have a kick-butt laptop that is almost always awesome-like in its sheer coolness.  On the contrary &#8211; it annoys me <em>indirectly</em>.  I say &#8220;indirectly&#8221; because it annoys <strong><em>everyone else</em></strong> in the family, who then come to me because I&#8217;m Mr IT Director and &#8220;fixing computers at work is what Daddy does.&#8221;  </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone" title="whall it director" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/whall-director.jpg" alt="" width="294" height="444" /></p>
<p>Yeah right.  I &#8220;fix computers&#8221; kind of like how a a skilled surgeon &#8220;kisses booboos.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Still, just as the cobbler&#8217;s children have no shoes, the performance and effectiveness of our family computer at home leaves a lot to be desired.  Sure, I do some decent basics, like each family member has a &#8220;Limited&#8221; XP account so as to cut down on spyware and viruses.  I have a <a href="http://blackice.iss.net/product_pc_protection.php" target="_blank">personal firewall</a> installed.  I have <a href="http://us.trendmicro.com/us/home/enterprise/" target="_blank">antivirus</a> installed and updated.  I use products like <a href="http://www.ccleaner.com/" target="_blank">CCleaner</a>, <a href="http://www.download.com/Trend-Micro-HijackThis/3000-8022_4-10227353.html" target="_blank">HijackThis</a>, <a href="http://www.lavasoft.com/" target="_blank">Adaware</a>, <a href="http://www.safer-networking.org/" target="_blank">Spybot Search &amp; Destroy</a>, <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/defender/default.mspx" target="_blank">Microsoft Defender</a> and a few others to keep the system running smoothly.  I do the immunizations, checks and prayer vigils that I believe I&#8217;m supposed to do.</p>
<p>But over time, the computer gets bloated.  Slower.  Buggy.  I frequently get inconvenient notices, usually in the form of an across-the-house yell, like &#8220;DAD! THE COMPUTER&#8217;S BROKEN!&#8221;  This commonly comes when Jaden is trying to watch <a href="http://www.icarly.com/" target="_blank">iCarly</a> or something off of Nick&#8217;s site.  I sometimes work on the issue, but I just get fed up, reboot and the problem goes away.</p>
<p>What do I do at work?  I work on computers, networks, servers, SANs, firewalls, gateways, web sites, databases, printers, laptops, desktops, blackberries, switches, phone systems, call centers, badge readers, camera systems, IP phones, wireless access points, IP KVM, monitoring sytems, terminal servers, ssl certificates, VPN concentrators, UPS systems, generators, server cabinets and that&#8217;s just my main job.  I intimately know TCP/IP, UDP, UNIX, Win, MOSS, DHCP, ATM, DHCP, LAN, MPLS, FTP, DNS, NIS, AD, RPC, SMTP, SNMP, DNIS, NTP, MIB, SSH, VOIP, H.323, RDP, X11, IOS, SIP, HTTP, VDN, ESX, OSI, VPN, SMS, HBA, SPS, WAN, PBX, UTM, PRI, DSL, Frame, and 8xx.</p>
<p>But do I want to do anything remotely related to those things at home?</p>
<p>In a word &#8211; NO.</p>
<p>So imagine my joy at getting an upgraded computer.  Well, let me clarify. Our previous computer was about 8 years old.  Our &#8220;upgraded computer&#8221; is only 3.5 years old.  In computer years, that&#8217;s like a 75yr old marathon runner getting a new 30yr old body.  It ain&#8217;t perfect, but boy is it nice!  A <em>brand new</em> computer, on the other hand, would be akin to a 21yr old body pumped up on amphetamines.</p>
<p>Kind of like this guy, but if he was 21yr old, had a good body and did drugs:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/whall-ms150.jpg" alt="" width="184" height="240" /></p>
<p>Now my family has a screamingly fast computer (compared to the old one) and everyone&#8217;s happy.  In technical terms, it&#8217;s has a 2Ghz CPU, 2GB ram, 2&#215;1.5TB SATA drives running in a RAID1 plus another 500GB extra non-RAID drive, and it&#8217;s running XP Media Center.  It has a CD/DVD burner with Lightscribe, and it has one of those built-in multi-media card reader thingies, where I can directly put in SD ram, MicroSD, sony memory sticks, CF cards, etc.</p>
<p>Life is good.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope it lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2009/01/09/in-which-i-wax-narcissistic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista Resource Monitor kicks Task Manager&#8217;s hienie</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2008/07/03/vista-resource-monitor-kicks-task-managers-hienie/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2008/07/03/vista-resource-monitor-kicks-task-managers-hienie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reliability monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sysinternals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[task manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/2008/07/03/vista-resource-monitor-kicks-task-managers-hienie/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I use Microsoft Vista more, I&#8217;m impressed by some common sense things that finally made it into the Operating System.  And don&#8217;t you try to tell me how to spell hienie. One of the things that bugged me for a long time was that I had to use third party tools, like sysinternals, to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I use Microsoft Vista more, I&#8217;m impressed by some common sense things that finally made it into the Operating System.  And don&#8217;t you try to tell me how to spell hienie.</p>
<p>One of the things that bugged me for a long time was that I had to use third party tools, like <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sysinternals.com">sysinternals</a>, to view details on what was taking up disk time, network time, memory, etc.  Task Manager was &#8220;ok&#8221; but lacked the real troubleshooting information I needed when I wanted to optimize my system.  (side note: Microsoft bought sysinternals a while back).</p>
<p>A Unix machine has no such limitation.  On Unix, I could use top, vmstat, lofs, tcpdump and many other command line tools to hone in and find EXACTLY what was going on with the system.  In short, I was Mr. BadAss Admin.</p>
<p>Now, Microsoft gives us the Resource Monitor:</p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" width="450" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-resource-monitor-2.jpg" alt="vista resource monitor" height="390" /></p>
<p>Like the Task Manager, it gives us eye candy for CPU usage, Network utilization and memory consumption.  It adds a cool graph for Disk Usage.</p>
<p>More importantly, however, it gives you expandable sections for Disk and Network so you can see exactly what process is using the hard drive or network card, and the details of that access.  What file is being throttled at a million miles per second?  Which app is trying to talk out my network and taking up a ton of resources?  Which ship can do the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs?</p>
<p>The collapsed summaries themselves give useful information</p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" width="433" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-pm-3.jpg" height="145" /><br />
I can see current usage and recent peak events</p>
<p>Even cooler that that- you can sort the columns and try to navigate your way to finding the anomalies.</p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" width="402" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-pm-4.jpg" height="139" /></p>
<p>For example, you might find that the search indexer is making your system crawl.  Outlook could be messing with a fragmented OST file.  The password crack program might be beating up your disk trying to brute force Obama&#8217;s website /etc/passwd file that was emailed to you by the Hillary campaign.</p>
<p>You can also narrow down network activity &#8211; who is woopra talking to?  What servers does trillian connect to?</p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" width="422" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-pm-5.jpg" height="158" /></p>
<p>About the only complaints I have about the tools it that you can&#8217;t right-click a process and *do* stuff with it like you can in Task Manager.  I want to be able to right-click and change process priority.  Or kill the process.  Or view the threads.  Or start a network sniffer.  Or tell it to get me a Pepsi.</p>
<p>Another refreshing thing (haha, get it?  it refreshes!  so it&#8217;s refreshing! HAHAHAHAHAA) is that Vista is actually *honest* about it&#8217;s problems.  It has a thing called the &#8220;Reliability Monitor&#8221; and it tracks all sorts of badness about your machine.</p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" width="450" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-pm-6.jpg" alt="vista reliability monitor" height="228" /></p>
<p>YES!  It is actually advertising and tracking when failures happen!  On a timeline!  Woo-hoo!</p>
<p>How cool is that? I can see the dates when app failures happen, or actual windows failures, when I install or uninstalled software, and actually SEE WHEN THINGS STARTED GOING WRONG. </p>
<p>Not only that, I can click on one of the red X&#8217;s and it will tell me which app crashed and the details</p>
<p align="center"><img border="0" width="450" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/vista-pm-7.jpg" height="51" /></p>
<p>I applaud the Microsoft developers for putting this stuff in and making power users like me happier about the crashes that do happen.</p>
<p>I also can&#8217;t wait to smash the first Mac whore who says &#8220;the Mac had that in &#8217;84 and we didn&#8217;t even NEED a service pack and the smell of my own gas is pleasant to me.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2008/07/03/vista-resource-monitor-kicks-task-managers-hienie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
