<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The blog of whall &#187; windows seven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/windows-seven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whall.org/blog</link>
	<description>Come on in and stay a while... laugh a little.  Maybe even think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Live Writer Test</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/22/live-writer-test/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/22/live-writer-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About the blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cool Online Things]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live writer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie maker 2.6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows movie maker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows seven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=2569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm.  Once Upon A time, on this Windows 7 thing there existed absolutely no Windows Movie Maker.  I use WMM to make my DITLs, so it was kind of frustrating to realize that I was required to do more work just so I could do the work to get it to work. That’s like me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Once Upon A time, on this Windows 7 thing there existed absolutely no Windows Movie Maker.  I use WMM to make <a href="http://whall.org/blog/category/vlogs/" target="_blank">my DITLs</a>, so it was kind of frustrating to realize that I was required to do more work just so I could do the work to get it to work.</p>
<p>That’s like me being the dude, playing the dude, disguised as another dude.</p>
<p>Being the savvy and worldly beta user, I decided to <a href="windows seven &quot;movie maker beta&quot;" target="_blank">google about windows 7 and windows movie maker first</a> to make sure someone else hadn’t accidentally deleted all their videos and set accidental fire to accidental baby kittens from installing the beta version and trying to create new content.</p>
<p>What I quickly found out was the version of Windows Movie Maker that Microsoft makes available is A) part of Windows Live (a collection of many online tools) and B) devoid of many advanced features that I depend on.  For example, I&#8217;m not a bit funny by myself, but Windows Movie Maker has that setting where you can make it &#8220;decently funny if a bit quirky&#8221; and I have mine set to 70%.</p>
<p>However, I also found out soon enough that MS <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=D6BA5972-328E-4DF7-8F9D-068FC0F80CFC&amp;displaylang=en" target="_blank">packaged up the Vista version of WMM (2.6)</a> for those of us who still needed the advanced features.  This made me happier than finding out Michael Phelps is more human than I expected and the media is more inhuman than I expected.</p>
<p>While I’m playing with installing WMM 2.6, I thought I’d give <a href="http://windowslivewriter.spaces.live.com/" target="_blank">Live Writer</a> a try – it’s a blog publishing tool that comes with the Windows Live collection and works with all sorts of blog platforms, including WordPress (which is what I use for this blog).</p>
<p>In fact, I’m actually composing this blog post with Live Writer.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone" title="editing wordpress blogs in microsoft live writer" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/live-writer-2.jpg" alt="" width="456" height="751" /></p>
<p>About the only things I care about regarding blog composition that save me time when writing a blog post is A) indenting text (which it seems Live Writer does NOT support) and B) pasting in pictures.  I pasted in the picture above, so we’ll see how it looks.</p>
<p>It kinda looks freaky with the whole picture within a picture thing.  How did it do that?  And how far does it go?  I&#8217;m scared.  I&#8217;m writing in my blog about writing in my blog, so I guess it&#8217;s like two mirrors facing each other.</p>
<p>I’ve <a href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/word-2007/" target="_blank">used Microsoft’s Word 2007 to publish blog entries before</a>, mainly because it had a geek factor to it and it also supported all my special little styling whims.  I could also compose while offline (like when taking bus to work) and publish later, and I always had a problem with that on WordPress.  This seems like a suitable replacement. Oh, and if your luggage ever gets lost or stolen, Samsonite is also a suitable replacement.</p>
<p>Time Passes&#8230;</p>
<p>So now I&#8217;ve attempted to publish this entry as a draft on my blog, but I keep getting a <strong>500 Internal Server Error</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone" title="live writer server error the server reported an error with the following url xmlrpc.php 500 internal server error" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/live-writer-1.jpg" alt="" width="363" height="238" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m too <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">tired</span> busy to troubleshoot if this is a WordPress 2.7.1 problem, a Windows Seven problem, a Live Writer bug or if it could be possibly explained by too much gluten in my diet.  (Wayne, don&#8217;t be so silly. Ack!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/22/live-writer-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seven</title>
		<link>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/19/seven-2/</link>
		<comments>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/19/seven-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Geekery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operating Systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64 bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ie8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple default printers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roboform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[send feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sharepoint datasheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snagit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snipping tool]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend micro officescan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows seven]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whall.org/blog/?p=2546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This past weekend, I bit the bullet and installed Windows 7 BETA on my work laptop, replacing Vista.  This is pretty big, given that at work we&#8217;re still standardized on Windows XP.  My move to Vista last year was an important leap of faith as it was, so going to Windows 7 (aka W7) marks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This past weekend, I bit the bullet and installed <strong>Windows 7</strong> <strong>BETA</strong> on my work laptop, replacing Vista.  This is pretty big, given that at work we&#8217;re still standardized on Windows XP.  My <a href="http://whall.org/blog/tag/vista/" target="_blank">move to Vista last year</a> was an important leap of faith as it was, so going to Windows 7 (aka W7) marks an even more risky foray into the world of Microsoft Operating Systems.  And going with beta makes it risk combined with cavalier abandon.</p>
<p>I have survived.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s been pretty fun.</p>
<p>Here are some of the things I&#8217;ve noticed so far that are worth mentioning.  I should point out that some of these may have been there in Vista and I just never noticed them.</p>
<p>To save on front page space, the rest is in the extended entry.</p>
<p><span id="more-2546"></span></p>
<p><strong>Multiple </strong><strong>default printers</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">When I&#8217;m at home, my default printer is [X]. When I&#8217;m at work, my default printer is [Y].  This is just so common sense I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m happy about it showing up in 2009.  But it really is COOL.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">It was nice for W7 to actually ask me what I wanted to do when I was adding the printer the first time.  It&#8217;s also nice that I can just bring up the start menu, type in &#8220;default printer&#8221; and it knows what I&#8217;m trying to do.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><img class="alignnone" title="windows seven manage default printers network" src="http://whall.org/blog/files/w7-printers-1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="251" /></p>
<p><strong>The thing is super fast</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I put my laptop specs down at the bottom, and YES, I realize I have a nice laptop.  I originally had XP on it but when I switched to Vista almost a year ago, I noticed Vista to be faster.  In general.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">The <a href="http://phillsimpson.com/" target="_blank">person who recommended W7 to me</a> said that W7 was even faster than Vista.  I&#8217;ve found that to be quite correct.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">However, I have to point out that I installed the 64-bit version of Windows 7, but I only had the 32-bit version of Vista before.  I can&#8217;t determine how much of my speed increase was due to each of three factors:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>1) A reinstall / purge </strong><br />
Starting over on any machine that&#8217;s been used for a while is bound to get a performance increase because of all the stuff you&#8217;ve loaded up over that time.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>2) Windows 7 over Vista </strong><br />
All I have going for this is that I&#8217;ve <em>heard </em>it&#8217;s faster.  I have no empirical data.  I don&#8217;t even have an empire.  Me so sad.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>3) 64bit vs 32bit</strong><br />
My gut feel is that this is probably the biggest reason for the performance increase, although I also have no empirical data.  According to Geekbench, <a href="http://64-bit-computers.com/windows-vista-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmark.html" target="_blank">64bit Vista is about 10% faster than 32bit Vista</a>, all else being equal.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">So, maybe each of the three had their input into the net result &#8211; all I know is that it <em>feels</em> twice as fast.  Windows pop up almost like they&#8217;d been expecting my click. Maybe the government is just watching me.</p>
<p><strong>Improved boot video</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">[youtube j7oDvY1-XeY]</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">You&#8217;d think posting about the animation used when a system boots is the epitome of &#8220;<em>has he run out of things to blog about</em>?&#8221;  But no.  It is pretty cool.  Kind of like some light energy bugs are converging and becoming the Vista/7 logo.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I think first impressions are important.  That&#8217;s why when I meet people I give them a lot of money.  I have so many friends!</p>
<p><strong>Snipping tool is cool</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve been a power user of <a href="http://www.techsmith.com/screen-capture.asp" target="_blank">SnagIt from TechSmith</a> for close to 7 years.  It&#8217;s one of the few tools I make sure I install as soon as I get on a machine.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">When I googled for any issues (I do this on almost all my installs of a new OS &#8211; find out if someone else has broken their machine by installing [X] software on [Y] OS) I saw a few things about the snipping tool that comes built-in to W7.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I also found out that it came with Vista.  Huh.  Go Figure.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Anyway, you can just Start Menu, type in &#8220;snip&#8221; and select the Snipping Tool and away you go &#8211; select a portion of the screen and it brings up a quick editor that you can annotate (very little), copy to clipboard, etc.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Apple&#8217;s OS X has had this for a while, and I think it&#8217;s great Microsoft has added it.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Still doesn&#8217;t hold a candle to SnagIt.  However, it&#8217;s nice to know I have it available when I&#8217;m visiting someone else&#8217;s computer.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Send Feedback&#8221; feature</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I really like how, just about everywhere you go, there&#8217;s the ability to &#8220;send feedback&#8221; to Microsoft on windows and features.  It allows you to rate your experience 1-7 stars, categorize your input, and tell what you like and don&#8217;t like.  This is surely just a &#8220;beta&#8221; feature but how cool would it be to be able to turn on &#8220;user feedback mode&#8221; on not only your operating system but also your applications?</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I use it 5-10 times per day.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Now, if we could get that feature on the government&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>More sensible backups</strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Chalk this up as another &#8220;<em>maybe this was there before but I didn&#8217;t notice it</em>&#8221; type of feature.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I plugged in a 500GB USB drive and in the AutoPlay window that popped up, I saw the option to &#8220;<em>use this drive as a backup</em>.&#8221;  This reminded me of the OS X Time Machine start-up ability (<em>except that Apple recommends that the drive be dedicated to Time Machine, which I don&#8217;t like</em>).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">You can specify more schedule options (<em>which is nice</em>) and the backup more or less happens in the background (<em>which is nice</em>).  But it didn&#8217;t tell me how long it would take, and it still just isn&#8217;t as good as Time Machine in the &#8220;<em>I have you covered</em>&#8221; area.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">For example, onApple&#8217;s  Time Machine, the default is to &#8220;snapshot&#8221; or make recoverable each hour from the last 24 hours, each day for the last week, etc.  It&#8217;s sensible.  I wish we had that for Windows.  It&#8217;s just smarter.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">In fact, I wish it would extend not only to other media, but online backup as well.  I should be able to point to FTP or other protocol-enabled storage sources and have it just Do The Right Thing™.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Still, Windows improved in this area quite a bit.  Kudo&#8217;s, Microsoft.</p>
<h3>The Issues</h3>
<p>And here are a few issues I&#8217;ve ran into.</p>
<p><strong>SharePoint on IE8 </strong></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Most everything seems to work ok, but I use datasheet mode on SharePoint all the time.  Think of using Excel or Numbers (spreadsheet) but interactive, on the web, and sharable by multiple people simultaneously.  That&#8217;s a great feature of SharePoint, and it&#8217;s called datasheet view.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">One of the cool things you can do in datasheet view is highlight some cells, and drag the auto-fill part of the selected area to other empty cells.  This either copies their data or intelligently alters them.  For example, if you have a series of dates, highlight 2 or 3 of them and then drag the autofill down and it increments the dates.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">This just doesn&#8217;t work in Internet Explorer 8, and it&#8217;s killing me!</p>
<h3>Other IE8 issues</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve noticed many sites don&#8217;t work, but that&#8217;s ok.  evite.com, anything with flash, etc.  So I just use FireFox 3.x which seems to work great.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;m also impressed that Roboform works with firefox now (and IE8) so I&#8217;m able to auto-fill things with either browser.  Sweet!</p>
<h3>Applications I&#8217;ve installed so far</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Here are the apps I&#8217;ve installed with little or no issue so far on my  Windows 7 64-bit laptop:</p>
<ul>
<li>Office 2007</li>
<li>Firefox 3.0</li>
<li>Adobe Reader 9.0</li>
<li>Roboform</li>
<li>CanoScan Toolbox (for my Canon LIDE 60 scanner)</li>
<li>FeedDemon / FeedStation</li>
<li>Office Live Meeting 2007</li>
<li>Office Live Meeting 2007 add-ins for Outlook</li>
<li>Picasa 3 (there are special backup/restore steps for this)</li>
<li>Putty v0.60</li>
<li>Snagit 9.1.1</li>
<li>TreeSize Free v2.2.1</li>
<li>Trillian Pro 3.1</li>
<li>TweetDeck (with Adobe AIR)</li>
<li>VMWare Infrastructure Client 2.5.0.64227</li>
<li>Weather Channel Desktop (came with something&#8230; I forget which.  Maybe Trillian?)</li>
<li>VIM 7.2 (with gvim)</li>
<li>UPDATE: Trend Micro OfficeScan v8.0 64-bit edition (MSI-based install)</li>
</ul>
<h3><strong>Laptop Specs:</strong></h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Dell Latitude D630<br />
Duo-core 2.00Ghz cpu<br />
3GB RAM / 250GB 7200 rpm hard drive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whall.org/blog/2009/02/19/seven-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
